Hello world!

This is my very first post and it is going to be a post about tattoos. It seemed only appropriate, as I’ve just been to my very first tattoo convention (which made my parents tremble again with fear of their daughter ruining her body, and the chance of finding a suitable husband as a consequence). Being there, I started thinking: is it really true that tattoos have moved beyond the world of the outcasts and socially deviants? In several recent studies it has been reported that in the USA about 20 % of the population aged 18 to 50 has at least one, and the numbers are growing. From my own experience I can say that a third of the people in my Archaeology Department were wearing tattoos. So, judging by the number of “subjects” and their cultural backgrounds, the answer seems to be yes.

It also became a fashionable topic for academic research, from Sociology of the body to History and Anthropology. One of the latest interesting projects is the University of Dundee‘s enterprise, whose purpose is to build a database of tattooed persons. This could act as an identifying tool in a disaster situation, but could also serve as a foundation for future research on tattoos and personal identity .

Then there are the studies that don’t focus on tattoos as part of a living individual, but as decorated skin, pieces of material culture. Among these, a nice example is the research done at University College London and the Science Museum, on a collection of tattooed skins from the late 19th-early 20th century.

However, is it really enough a growing number of tattoos and rising academic interest to change the status of this body modification process in the European and USA current societies? My hunch would be that the answer is no. What is happening is not that tattoos become an accepted form of body decoration (as it was the case for several historic populations or some living ones), but that the boundaries of social deviance are re-negotiated. In a world of confusion, in which old norms are taken down, the body is seen as one of the last fixed points that belong to us. Therefore, it is the most important vehicle for creating and expressing identity. Even more, it started being understood as a project that can be modified as the owner wants it, and what we witness in the media, in the fashion street blogs, and all around is a world-as-spectacle: “Dress to impress” seems to be the new motto (and this can mean anything, from modifying the weight, plastic surgery, decorating it etc.). Therefore, tattoos haven’t been raised to a whole new level, but the society changed and is now experiencing a generalised “outcast” feeling, trying to find something material to hold onto and say “this is me”. Of course, the individual motivations can be varied and sound extremely far from this, but once you take a step back and look at the big picture, the question remains: Why now? (What has changed so that tattoos became widespread? Is it just time, or are there other similar things happening in the same time?).

So, even though from a different point of view than the one intended, maybe my parents are right to be concerned about finding the suitable husband 🙂

Photo source.

(Xoïl, Needles Side TattOo)

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Hello world!

  1. the body is a place for identity, but more so, in the boundaries of a society who sees a lot but remembers nothing, the body becomes a place for memory, personal history, which is, i think, one of the most important reasons why people get tattoos nowadays: short attention spam 🙂 and a deficit of shared stories.

  2. Thanks for the comment! first one 🙂
    I totally agree on the “short attention spam” aspect and the deficit of shared stories. And i think one of the reasons is exactly this grounding in the materiality of being.

  3. I wonder if other body modification , enhancements . as they are sometimes called as under the skin implants, are a product of tattoos becoming to mainstream in a way. I do agree of course that society dose renegotiate identity and moves the yard stick around by which outcasts can be indetifed. Would it be the case tough of subcultures that have tattos as part of their appereal be getting also bigger? Certainly it not considered deviation but normal and desired from within them :). But I guess you can analyse it from a group social dynamics or individuals choice, but that goes in to how much our personal aesthetic are really our own. I digress tough.
    At least you have to confront your parents on the issue of tattoos. I still confront mine on the issue of long hair :)). I’m pretty sure there are still plenty of fish in the “suitable husbands” sea of Romania 😛

  4. i think the same- that other body “enhancements” are just the product of tattoos becoming too mainstream. I am happy for your comment, and thanks for it! Like Madalina, you highlighted some relevant aspects, to a very wide topic indeed. Probably what i was trying to get to is that we are living in a world that goes through a little identity crisis, and the increased number of tattoos is but a part of it 🙂

  5. Pingback: Witty tattoos (some inspiration for science writing) | Title under construction

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s